Re: teeny patch


Subject: Re: teeny patch
From: Scott Bingman (mrphido@prodigy.net)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2001 - 08:12:46 CDT


Scott Bingman wrote:

> F J Franklin wrote:
>
>> Build peer libiconv before peer wv
>> (only unix makefile needs changing, others correct already)
>>
>> Frank
>>
>> ps. Building on linux with /usr/include/iconv.h removed is an
>> interesting
>> experiment, and not really one with a happy ending.
>>
>> Francis James Franklin
>> F.J.Franklin@shef.ac.uk
>>
>> `people who are strangers to liquor are incapable of talking about
>> literature.'
>> Those refreshing words filled my head with the clarified butter of great
>> wisdom, removed all obstacles to understanding. Truly it was a case of:
>> `Open the gates of the throat and pour down a bucket of Maotai.'
>> --- Mo Yan
>>
> Please add this information to the README of libiconv/ and wv/ and
> possibly the BUILD of abi/ so that problems are prevented in the
> future for many. It seems to me that this is not the only case of "you
> have to build this before that."
>
> Scott Bingman
>
>
>
>
Maybe I should clarify. If someone wanted to do a manual build of the
libraries before making, there seems to be a specific order they need to
be compiled in. What order they need to be compiled in, should be in
the BUILD file. I know it should be a simple ./autogen.sh, ./configure,
make process. But my experience says if that doesn't work the first
time, then the logical process is to assume that the libraries need to
be built individually first, what order they need to be built in would
be useful.
Or, I'm off my rocker and out of sync and just ignore this whole rant.

Scott Bingman



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Aug 09 2001 - 09:18:39 CDT