Subject: Re: towards a release process that Just Works
From: JAL (solnul@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 17:11:00 CDT
On 16 Aug 2001 11:06:37 -0700, Paul Rohr wrote:
> packager(s)
> - responsible for creating "enough" clean packages (#3 & #4)
> - this could be ad hoc, Sam-style ... upload one package & MD5
> - or more systematic ... fix Tinderbox and build farm
>
> tester(s)
> - responsible for testing and verifying each package (#3 & #4)
> - by definition, this must be someone other than the packager
> - this is all manual labor, I'm afraid
> - would help to have a minimal checklist, though
> How does that sound? Who's ready to volunteer?
I can build Slackware 8 packages for gnome, gtk, ispell, pspell, expat,
and any combo thereof.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Thu Aug 16 2001 - 17:14:17 CDT