Re: "must have" packages


Subject: Re: "must have" packages
From: Håkan Waara (hwaara@chello.se)
Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 17:54:26 CDT


David Chart wrote:

> On 24 Aug 2001 14:28:10 -0700, Paul Rohr wrote:
>
>>level one: must have
>>---------------------
>>
>
> Just one comment here. We must have at least two platforms worth of
> binaries, so that users continue to believe that we are committed to
> being cross-platform. "We're cross platform, but we only have Windows
> binaries" is not going to convince.
>
>

I think providing binaries for the three major OS' (MacOS, Linux,
Windows) should be considered a must.

Especially if the release intervals are going to slow down somewhat,
this might be worth it.

-- 
Håkan Waara (hwaara@chello.se)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Aug 24 2001 - 17:53:11 CDT