Subject: Re: Win98 i18n Unicode fonts trouble possibly solved.
From: Saint-Denis (stdenisg@cedep.net)
Date: Sat Jan 06 2001 - 13:35:02 CST
> > The patch I am proposing is making some ground for Win9x. It now support
> > usuals, unicode and symbol fonts. Symbol fonts are detected
automaticaly.
> > Characters widths are evaluated correctly.
>
> I had a quick look at your proposed patch, and though I haven't actually
> tried it yet I think it's the best solution so far.
>
> The only reservation I have is the use of the static member function as a
C
> callback. For more information, see:
> <http://anubis.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#168>.
>
I have read the article indicated above. It talk about "A C language linkage
is ignored for the names of class members and the member function types of
*non-static* class member functions", I agree with that. The callback
function is declared static in the header file, so there is no problem.
Would someone be so kind as to try it on WinNT or Win98 and commit it? It
work on my Win95 system.
Gilles
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Jan 06 2001 - 13:36:23 CST