Re: profile results for new UT_* implementations?


Subject: Re: profile results for new UT_* implementations?
From: Joaquín Cuenca Abela (cuenca@pacaterie.u-psud.fr)
Date: Wed Jun 20 2001 - 06:15:52 CDT


On 19 Jun 2001 21:59:25 -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:00:38PM +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
> > Can do:
> >
> > props += "margin-left:";
> > props += "1.0in; ";
>
> I sincerely hope this isn't a real-life example.

why not?

if you don't know the "1.0in; " value at the same time than
"margin-left: ", then it can be a perfectly valid example (maybe you're
thinking that it will be too slow... with current UT_String
implementation probably the second += will not need any reallocation)

Cheers,

--
Joaquín Cuenca Abela
cuenca@celium.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Jun 20 2001 - 10:58:57 CDT