Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: librsvg status?
From: Leonard Rosenthol (leonardr@lazerware.com)
Date: Mon Oct 29 2001 - 08:03:01 CST
At 12:32 PM +0000 10/29/01, F J Franklin wrote:
> > but it uses libart and FreeType (as Darin
>> notes above) as the rendering backends to do that.
>
>However, I quite like the idea of using libart and freetype to do a
>cross-platform implementation.
Except that libart has way too many bugs in it's path
handling code, IMO. If you want a completely XP SVG implementation -
you can just use ImageMagick!
>I am of course biased, but I've been writing the UT_XML stuff with SVG
>support in mind. No doubt there is a lot that can be learned/stolen/etc.
>from librsvg but do we really need to make that explicit?
>
Not necessarily. Martin just asked me about it...
LDR
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You've got a SmartFriend in Pennsylvania
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol Internet: leonardr@lazerware.com
Web Site: <http://www.lazerware.com/>
Coola Signature: <http://signature.coola.com/?leonardr@lazerware.com>
PGP Fingerprint: C76E 0497 C459 182D 0C6B AB6B CA10 B4DF 8067 5E65
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Oct 29 2001 - 08:03:49 CST