Re: 32-bit UT_UCSChar (3)

• Previous message: Martin Sevior: "Re: Abiword in (unhacked) Evolution."
• In reply to: Tomas Frydrych: "32-bit UT_UCSChar (3)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

 --- Tomas Frydrych <tomas@frydrych.uklinux.net>
wrote: >
> On further thought, I will do away with the
> UT_UCSChar type,
> replacing it instead with UT_UCS2Char and
> UT_UCS4Char (and
> corresponding UT_UCS2_ and UT_UCS4_ string
> functions). This
> will be clearer.

When are we ever going to need a UT_UCS2Char or a
UT_UCS2String? We'll only need UCS-2 for interaction
with Windows or some importing and exporting. In
those cases we'll just need to iconv into a buffer -
not a full string class. It'll also be confusing and
people will wonder which one to use.

Andrew Dunbar.

> Tomas

=====
http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net http://www.abisource.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

• Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Commit: AbiWidget work"
• Previous message: Martin Sevior: "Re: Abiword in (unhacked) Evolution."
• In reply to: Tomas Frydrych: "32-bit UT_UCSChar (3)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 02 2002 - 09:49:29 EDT