Re: commit (HEAD): IMPORTANT - 32-bit UT_UCSChar

From: Petr Tomasek (tomasek@etf.cuni.cz)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 11:30:21 EDT

  • Next message: Paul Rohr: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"

    On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:14:17PM +0100, F J Franklin wrote:
    > >
    > > No, there are functions _beside_ the iconv (i.e g_iconv or g_convert)
    > > conversions.
    > >
    > > You can find there for example functions like g_utf8_to_ucs4, or
    > > g_ucs4_to_utf8 or even g_ucs4_to_utf16 and much more...
    > >
    > > (Please take look at:
    > > http://devloper.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-unicode-manipulation.html )
    >
    > I'm tempted to ask why you ask questions to which you know the answer.
    >
    > Unexpectedly on-list,
    > Frank (glib newbie)

    I didn't know :-o. I just had the feeling there was something like this.
    After your response I checked the docs.

    Anyway, I don't mean to offend You or anything simillar
    - if You think it's better to write these functions, rather than reusing
    the glib ones - than I have nothing against - it's you who write it.

    On the other hand, I thought maybe I could help you noticing that...

    PT>

    --
    Petr Tomasek, http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 09 2002 - 11:29:35 EDT