From: Patrick Lam (plam@plam.lcs.mit.edu)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 14:05:21 EDT
I stumbled across the following comment:
/*
Jeff, I weakened the following assert because we
*want* to represent no tabstops as an empty string.
If this isn't safe, let me know. -- PCR
*/
UT_ASSERT(p[1] /* && *p[1] */); // require value for each name
It seems that we have a bunch of other empty props now too, like
TF's new 'display' property.
Now, I've been working on some field code (bug: start typing in
italics and insert a field; the field does not appear in italics!)
and in fixing this bug, I get the corresponding assert in the
attributes code.
That's because a field has an empty string "" in its param attribute.
Do we really want that? If so, I'll weaken the attribute assert too.
pat
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 27 2002 - 14:10:59 EDT