I made a patch (revision 31766) using UTF-16 instead of UCS-2 as
default encoder.
UTF-16 is an extension of UCS-2 that allow the representation of code
points above U+FFFF. While UTF-16 and UCS-2 have the same
representation for Unicode points below U+FFFF, values above (like
U+10000) cannot be represented in UCS-2.
Simon
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Ingo Brückl <ib@wupperonline.de> wrote:
>
> Jean Brefort wrote on Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:18:15 +0200:
>
>> Should we apply Ying-Chun Liu's patch? I'm not an expert about the
>> various unicode representations, so that I am not sure about that.
>
> Me neither, although his patch seemed to work for me. But, what about the
> other UTF-16 entries then? Should they all move up?
>
> Ingo
Received on Sat Aug 18 19:53:32 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 18 2012 - 19:53:33 CEST