Re: commit: initial babarism support for ispell

From: Jordi Mas (jmas@softcatala.org)
Date: Fri Oct 11 2002 - 04:43:16 EDT

  • Next message: Alan Horkan: "Re: the GNOME HIG and AbiWord (fwd)"

    Hello,

    > This is just wrong. I tried to discuss what was
    > needed
    > in an open way when Barbarism support first came up.
    > We don't need a knee-jerk fix for a single problem.
    > We need something flexible that'll be able to be re-
    > used in intelligent ways. Surely!
    > Grammar errors are just errors too yet they get a
    > different colour. I tried to warn that even though
    > to you in your language you consider it spelling, that
    > others in other languages or other areas fixable by
    > the exact same new feature would look at it
    > differently
    > - this is why I advocated generic squiggle code with
    > colours etc settable by the caller.
    > (Sorry that was a rant - I'm in a volative mood)

    That's wrong in your opinion, that is very respectable. I do not want to enter
    in a discussion that I already had. If you have a better way of doing it,
    please give a specific proposal and I have no problem enhancing that is
    already been done.

    > We are? Where can I read about it? Don't have IRC
    > ability right now if that's where it was discussed.

    We talk about IRC about a few weeks ago. Dom was going to do the work.

    Thanks Andrew,

    -- 
    

    Jordi Mas http://www.softcatala.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 11 2002 - 04:49:41 EDT