From: Peter Jacobi (pj@walter-graphtek.com)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 06:33:57 EDT
Dear Alan, All,
> You missed my point. Consider the xhtml document below. It
> contains a couple entities for which there are pretty
> standard substitutes. (Normal quote for “ the
> consecutive hyphens for —)
Wheras using HTML entities seems natural for you, Mathematicans and
other heavy users of TeX may want to see TeX digraphs/trigraphs,
those grown up with ViM would like ViM digraphs, weirdos who
keep themselves amused by memorizing UNICODE may want
U+1234 notation etc, etc.
As is often rightly said, the good thing of standards is, that there are
so many of them.
I would agree with you, if Abiword would have sort of modes, then in HTML
mode HTML entitities would be wise choice. But only then.
Regards,
Peter Jacobi
-----------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
abiword-user-request@abisource.com with the word
unsubscribe in the message body.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 15 2003 - 06:49:41 EDT