Re: adding support for missing languages

From: ericzen (ericzen@ez-net.com)
Date: Sat Oct 12 2002 - 00:20:47 EDT

  • Next message: Jordi Mas: "Re: adding support for missing languages"

    On 2002.10.11 22:57 Andrew Dunbar wrote:
    >
    > Nope because the formula of the tags is ISO 639 + dash
    > + ISO 3166
    >
    > Both of these ISO standards have changed and will
    > change again. So we can't just make up our own
    > letters. I'm sure this is specifically forbidden in
    > some RFC somewhere. RO is probably Romania and even
    > if it's not it's entirely likely to become something
    > at some point and then we'd be in trouble.
    >
    > It *is* legal to use tags such as "x-foo". IANA has
    > accepted registrations for such with x- and art- and
    > maybe another which escapes me. I see these used for
    > Lojban and Klingon for instance.
    >
    > Note that in this case "x" is no longer a language
    > code so parsing the tags is potentially more complex.
    >
    > > For your amusement only.
    >
    > Don't worry I was amused (:
    >
    > Andrew.
    >
    > =====
    > http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/translator.pl http://www.abisource.com
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Everything you'll ever need on one web page
    > from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
    > http://uk.my.yahoo.com
    >
    >

    AbiKlingon?
    /me pictures the unending amusement of this concept
    AbiScriptKiddie, AbiTokiPona, AbiRedNeck, AbiHex, AbiBinary
    Ooh, AbiMonopoly
    "To assert information about a misfeature, please complete the form provided"
    Hey, AbiCanadian!
    Stuff, eh? Do Stuff, eh? Meese, eh? Hockey, eh?
    First grammer checker for AbiCanadian:
    This sentence doesn't end in "eh?" eh?

    What? No bug graph...I know where these thoughts are going!



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 12 2002 - 00:26:06 EDT